Moisture absorbers like Hippo and DampRid are essential allies in the battle against excess indoor humidity. While both use calcium chloride to suck moisture from the air, they differ in design and functionality.
The refillable, spill-proof Hippo boasts a higher absorption capacity of 27 oz. and a lifespan of up to 6 months. Conversely, the disposable DampRid maxes out at 20 oz., requires frequent replacements, but offers an optional fragrance.
As you go deeper, you’ll uncover more nuances that’ll help you choose the perfect moisture-battling sidekick.
A Brief Comparison Table
| Feature | Hippo Moisture Absorber | DampRid Moisture Absorber |
| Absorption Capacity | Up to 400ml | Up to 450ml |
| Refillable | Yes | No |
| Odor Elimination | Yes | Yes |
| Non-Toxic | Yes | Yes |
| Reusable | Yes | No |
| Price | 15-25 | 10-20 |
| Coverage Area | Up to 200 sq. ft. | Up to 250 sq. ft. |
Key Differences Between Hippo And Damprid Moisture Absorbers
While both the Hippo and DampRid moisture absorbers are formidable contenders in the battle against excess moisture, they have several key differences that set them apart. Let’s delve into these distinctions in detail.
Design and Functionality
- Refillable Vs. Disposable
One of the most significant differences between the Hippo and DampRid moisture absorbers lies in their design and functionality.
The Hippo is a refillable moisture absorber, which means you can easily replenish its calcium chloride crystals once they’ve reached their maximum absorption capacity.
This not only saves you money in the long run but also reduces waste, making it an eco-friendly choice.
On the other hand, the DampRid is a disposable moisture absorber, which means you’ll need to replace the entire unit once it has reached its maximum capacity.
While this might be more convenient for some, it can lead to higher long-term costs and generate more waste.
- Spill-Proof Design
Another key difference is the Hippo’s spill-proof design. This feature ensures that even if the unit is accidentally tipped over or knocked around, the calcium chloride solution won’t spill out, preventing any potential messes or damage to your floors or surfaces.
The DampRid, on the other hand, does not have a spill-proof design, which means you’ll need to exercise extra caution when handling it to avoid accidental spills.
Capacity and Lifespan
- Absorption Capacity
When it comes to absorption capacity, the Hippo takes the lead with an impressive capacity of up to 27 ounces of moisture. This makes it an ideal choice for larger spaces or areas with higher humidity levels.
The DampRid, while still a capable moisture absorber, has a slightly lower capacity of up to 20 ounces, which may require more frequent replacements or multiple units for larger spaces.
- Lifespan
Another notable difference is the lifespan of these two moisture absorbers. The Hippo boasts a lifespan of up to six months, depending on the humidity levels in your space. This means you can enjoy extended use without the need for frequent replacements.
In contrast, the DampRid has a shorter lifespan of up to 60 days, which means you’ll need to replace it more frequently, especially in high-humidity environments.
- Fragrance and Scent
While both moisture absorbers use calcium chloride as their active ingredient, the DampRid offers an optional fragrance option, allowing you to choose between a fresh scent or an unscented version.
The Hippo, on the other hand, does not contain any added fragrances, which may be preferable for those with sensitivities or those who prefer a scent-free environment.
Cost and Availability
- Initial Investment
When it comes to cost, the Hippo moisture absorber typically carries a higher initial investment compared to the DampRid. However, its refillable design and longer lifespan can potentially save you money in the long run.
The DampRid, being a disposable option, may have a lower upfront cost, but the need for frequent replacements can add up over time, making it a more expensive choice in the long run.
- Availability
In terms of availability, the DampRid moisture absorber is more widely available in retail stores and online marketplaces, making it a readily accessible option for many consumers.
The Hippo, while still available in many stores and online, may have a slightly more limited availability compared to the DampRid, depending on your location and retailer.
The Hippo Moisture Absorber: A Closer Look
You might be wondering, what makes Hippo a popular choice among homeowners?
For starters, its absorption capacity is impressive, with the ability to absorb up to 400ml of moisture from the air.
That’s a lot of dampness eliminated!
The refillable design is also a major plus, as you can reuse the product multiple times, making it a cost-effective option in the long run.
One of the standout features of Hippo is its odor elimination capabilities.
Say goodbye to that musty smell and hello to fresh, clean air.
The non-toxic formula ensures your family and pets are safe, and the reusable design reduces waste.
However, Hippo does have some drawbacks. The initial cost might be higher than DampRid, and some users have reported that the product can be messy to refill.
Pros and Cons of Hippo Moisture Absorber
Pros:
- Reusable and refillable
- Impressive absorption capacity
- Odor elimination capabilities
- Non-toxic and safe for families and pets
Cons:
- Higher initial cost
- Messy refill process
- Limited coverage area
The DampRid Moisture Absorber: A Closer Look
DampRid is another well-known brand in the moisture absorber market, and for good reason.
Its absorption capacity is slightly higher than Hippo’s, at up to 450ml.
The product is also non-toxic and odor-eliminating, making it a great option for families and pet owners.
One of the major advantages of DampRid is its affordability.
The initial cost is often lower than Hippo’s, making it an attractive option for those on a budget.
The product is also easy to use and dispose of, with no messy refills required.
However, DampRid has some limitations.
The product is not reusable, which can lead to more waste and higher costs in the long run. The coverage area is also slightly larger than Hippo’s, but not significantly so.
Pros and Cons of DampRid Moisture Absorber
Pros:
- Affordable initial cost
- Easy to use and dispose of
- Non-toxic and odor-eliminating
- Higher absorption capacity
Cons:
- Not reusable
- More waste generated
- Limited cost-effectiveness in the long run
Also Read: Differences Between DampRid And Arm & Hammer Moisture Absorbers.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
The best moisture absorber for you depends on your specific needs and priorities. If you value reusability and cost-effectiveness, Hippo might be the way to go. If you’re on a tighter budget and prefer a hassle-free option, DampRid is a great choice.
Hippo is a popular alternative to DampRid, offering impressive absorption capacity and odor elimination capabilities. Other options include silica gel-based products and calcium chloride-based products.
The best thing to absorb moisture from the air depends on your specific needs and preferences. Moisture absorbers like Hippo and DampRid are popular options, but you might also consider dehumidifiers or silica gel-based products.
The best dehumidifying solution depends on the size of the area you need to dehumidify and your budget. Moisture absorbers like Hippo and DampRid are great for smaller areas, while dehumidifiers might be more effective for larger spaces.
Wrapping Up
In conclusion, choosing the right moisture absorber for your needs can be a daunting task. By considering the pros and cons of Hippo and DampRid, you’ll be well on your way to eliminating that musty smell and enjoying fresh, clean air.
Remember to prioritize your needs and budget, and don’t hesitate to explore other options if neither of these products meets your requirements. Happy dehumidifying!
Jeffery Carlson
I am Jeffery L. Carlson and you know the drill! I write for you and if you interact with me, please feel free to comment on any post you like!
